Tuesday February 9, 2010

SITE SEARCH

News Archive Search
w w w . w a s t e r e c y c l i n g n e w s . c o m
SIGN UP FOR
WRN E-MAILS
Register for Waste & Recycling News'
e-newsletters here
.
TAKE THE
WASTE & RECYCLING NEWS POLL
Poll results | Submit comment
Past polls


Fresh drink of water

The proof will be in the pudding, but the partnership between the American Beverage Association and the Climate Group has a good deal of promise to significantly improve the environmental impact of one of our most high-profile products, beverage containers.

The partnership, called Recycled Together, aims to use the beverage industry´s considerable marketing power to encourage recycling. But it also will push beverage manufacturers to design their packaging in a more environmentally friendly manner, such as making lighter containers, using higher percentages of recyclable materials and striving to make containers close to 100% recyclable.

Perhaps one measure of how serious manufacturers are about the project is whether they become more receptive to bottle bills and container deposits, something they have generally been opposed to in the past. In New York, for example, the governor is pushing to expand the state´s bottle bill, in part because officials see an important potential revenue source in the unclaimed deposits.

Bottle bills are just one solution to reducing container waste. But real progress in whatever form can have a psychological as well as direct environmental benefit. Getting consumers thinking more about recycling can have a snowball effect.

Not to mention the value of generating potential revenue in these dire economic times.

(Jan. 5 issue)


Comments
I think that it's duplicitous to expect revenue from unclaimed bottle deposits. Here in CT the governor is trying to access these funds. While I understand that it's financially wasteful not to access these funds, it is deceitful to increase the bottle deposits under the guise of promoting recycling and the actual hopes of keeping the revenue. With other options available to us, i.e. curbside recycling or scrapping, maybe bottle deposits are antiquated. It takes energy to run the facilities and gas for consumers to drive to the facilities with their empties. I do believe that in the era before curbside recycling this process discouraged people from throwing their containers in the trash. I have also heard that some waste disposal companies sift through the trash for recyclables. The ones that seem to be benefiting from this process are people that dedicate a large portion of time to collecting and returning the containers for money (which I am happy they do), and now the government that charges us a deposit and then decides to keep it!

Joellyn Nunno
CT

Honestly, given the responsibilities of state government, they need any form of funding possible. So many needs handled by the state. Let them have it....maybe they will allocate it to the environment or to social services.

Portia Graves
Sales
TRC
Midwest




To fill out the 2010 Municipal Recycling Survey click here.

Do you have an idea for a way we can make wasterecyclingnews.com better? Please submit it here.


Have an idea for a story that you think Waste & Recycling News should cover? Submit story ideas here.

For up-to-the-minute news delivered automatically to your desktop click here.