|
|||||||
|
![]() w w w . w a s t e r e c y c l i n g n e w s . c o m |
SIGN UP FOR
Register for Waste & Recycling News'WRN E-MAILS e-newsletters here. | |||||
The study — which was commissioned by Germany’s Association for Plastics Packaging and Films — shows that, when all environmental factors are considered, the least environmentally damaging option for plastics waste bags is to use recycled PE, followed by virgin PE. The current biodegradable options — including both petrochemical and renewably sourced plastics — performed the worst in its analysis.
The study looked at 20- and 120-liter plastic waste bags on the market in Germany and a 30-liter size popular in France, comparing both virgin and recycled PE resins with commercially available biodegradable alternatives including starch and PLA-based formulations.
According to IFEU, the environmental profile of each waste bag is dominated by the raw material production process, with conversion to bags and transport to point-of-sale relatively minor contributors in most cases.
“Consequently, the environmental impact of each bag type considered in the study will be lower the thinner the product is,” it says in its conclusion.
Virgin PE and recycled PE score well in environmental terms because the resins enable high levels of down-gauging to be achieved. The study shows the 20-liter PE bags used in Europe have a typical gauge of around 12.5 microns, compared to a range of 15 to 25 microns for biodegradable types.
The IFEU analysis also takes into account future anticipated improvements in the biodegradable plastics sector in terms of resin manufacturing efficiency and material performance. However, the study authors point out that none of its forecast future scenarios result in the materials outperforming PE in general waste bag applications.
Copyright 2009 Crain Communications Inc. All Rights Reserved.